OLICK v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, CITY OF EASTON, CITY OF EASTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRUNEO, MARACINNI and LOHENITZ |
THOMAS W. OLICK |
5:2015cv05820 |
October 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Northampton |
EDWARD G. SMITH |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO RECONSIDER THIS COURT'S 11/13/18 ORDER" (DOCKET NO. 53) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR SPOILAGE OF EVIDENCE" (DOCKET NO. 56) IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S &quo t;MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY" (DOCKET NO. 65) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO QUASH AND/OR ESTOP PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION" (DOCKET NO. 66) IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S "AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY REGARDING ADMISSIONS" (DOCKET NO. 67) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 6/13/19. 6/13/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(er, ) |
Filing 33 OPINION/ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL MARK CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-5786 CLOSED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANTS IN CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-5820 IS GRANTED. ALL MOTIONS CURRENTLY PENDING IN 15-5820 ARE DENIED, AND 15-5820 IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-5820 CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 11/10/16. 11/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.