KERCHER v. THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District KERCHER v. THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER

KERCHER v. THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER

Plaintiff:	JEAN KERCHER
Defendant:	THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Case Number:	5:2015cv06674
Filed:	December 17, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Allentown Office
County:	Schuykill
Presiding Judge:	JOSEPH F. LEESON
Nature of Suit:	Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2017	Filing 44 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS IV (VIOLATION OF FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT) AND V (VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS) OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT WHICH ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO COUNT III (RETALIATORY DISCHARGE) OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 9/6/17. 9/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
December 5, 2016	Filing 19 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I AND II OF THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 27, 2016 TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I AND II. IT IS ALSO ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO ALL REMAINING CLAIMS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 12/5/16. 12/5/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2017

Filing 44 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS IV (VIOLATION OF FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT) AND V (VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS) OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT WHICH ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED AS TO COUNT III (RETALIATORY DISCHARGE) OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 9/6/17. 9/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

December 5, 2016

Filing 19 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AS TO COUNTS I AND II OF THE PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL DECEMBER 27, 2016 TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH RESPECT TO COUNTS I AND II. IT IS ALSO ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO ALL REMAINING CLAIMS. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 12/5/16. 12/5/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KERCHER v. THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEAN KERCHER
Represented By:	STANLEY J. BRASSINGTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: THE READING MUHLENBERG CAREER & TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?