RODENBAUGH v. SANTIAGO et al
DAPHNE RODENBAUGH |
SANTIAGO, JASON ADDUDDELL, TRACY BONDALL and ALLEX THOMARAU |
5:2016cv02158 |
May 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Allentown Office |
Lackawanna |
EDWARD G. SMITH |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 45 OPINION/ORDER THAT BOANDL'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 42) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, BOANDL, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, RODENBAUGH; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 7/6/17. 7/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, ) |
Filing 30 OPINION/ORDER THAT BOANDL'S ADDENDUM TO HER MOTION TO DISMISS, WHICH RE-RAISED THE ARGUMENTS SET FORTH IN HER MOTION TO DISMISS AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 28) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, BOANDL, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, DAPHNE RODENBAUGH; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 2/14/17. 2/14/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, ) |
Filing 27 OPINION/ORDER THAT THE OUTSTANDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 21, 22) ARE GRANTED AND DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT ALEX THOMAS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 1/18/17. 1/18/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE', UNREP AND E-MAILED.(ky, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.