WILSON v. CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION
CRYSTAL WILSON |
CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION |
5:2020cv01021 |
February 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
R BARCLAY SURRICK |
Civil Rights: Employment |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14131807.), filed by CRYSTAL WILSON.(KARPF, ARI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILSON v. CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL WILSON | |
Represented By: | ARI RISSON KARPF |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.