HART v. STONE et al
| KATHLEEN HART |
| CHRISTOPHER STONE and EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING COMPANY |
| 5:2020cv02779 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| EDWARD G SMITH |
| P.I.: Motor Vehicle |
| 28:1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE TO BE CONDUCTED VIA TELEPHONE Please be advised that an initial pretrial conference to be conducted via telephone before Judge Edward G. Smith in the above-captioned case has been scheduled for MONDAY, AUGUST 10, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for all the parties will use dial in number 1-571-353-2300 and use pin 363 973 916# to enter the conference call.(sres, ) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING COMPANY.(KAELIN, JOHN) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint together with With Affirmative Defenses by EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING COMPANY, CHRISTOPHER STONE.(KAELIN, JOHN) |
| Summons Issued as to EARL L. HENDERSON TRUCKING COMPANY, CHRISTOPHER STONE. E-MAILED To: COUNSEL on 6/11/2020 (bw, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by KATHLEEN HART. (lisad, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT KATHLEEN HART against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0313-14346536.), filed by KATHLEEN HART.(YOUNG, JONATHAN) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2020: #1 Designation Form) (lisad, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
