WILLIAMS V. STATE FARM
| THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. |
| STATE FARM |
| 5:2021cv00058 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 Amended MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN PART, filed by STATE FARM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(PUGA, JAVIER)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by GARY A. BRIENZA on behalf of THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(BRIENZA, GARY)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 Amended MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN PART, filed by THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit in Support of Opposition, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A Post loss Assignment, #3 Brief Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition, #4 Certificate of Service Cert Serv Answer to Motion and brief)(ALMONTI, ANGELO)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF 2/11/21 THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, ECF NO. 4, IT IS ORDERED THAT: THE PRAECIPE, ECF NO. 4 IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 3, IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON JR ON 2/11/21. 2/11/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT)
|
|
Filing 5
Amended MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN PART, filed by STATE FARM.MEMORANDUM OF LAW, CERTICIATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit)(PUGA, JAVIER)
|
|
Filing 4
to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss Filed 01/28/2021 by STATE FARM. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(PUGA, JAVIER)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, IN PART, filed by STATE FARM.Memorandum of Law, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit)(PUGA, JAVIER)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 1/7/21. 1/7/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(dt, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by STATE FARM (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0313-14824542), filed by STATE FARM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Designation Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Case Management Track Form)(PUGA, JAVIER)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WILLIAMS V. STATE FARM | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: THOMAS P. WILLIAMS, SR. | |
| Represented By: | ANGELO T. ALMONTI |
| Represented By: | GARY A. BRIENZA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STATE FARM | |
| Represented By: | JAVIER PUGA |
| Represented By: | WESLEY R. PAYNE |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
