CARR v. KAUFMANN et al
JACQUIN JOHN CARR |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, KEVIN KAUFFMAN and KEVIN KAUFMANN |
5:2021cv02898 |
June 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
CHAD F KENNEY |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Document #4 mailed to pro se petitioner. (kw, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER THAT THE COURT WILL ACCPET CARR'S FILING ON THE NON-STANDARD FORM. CARR SHOULD REVIEW THE INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM. IF CARR INTENDS TO PURSUE THIS MATTER HE SHALL SUBMIT A NOTICE TO THIS COURT STATING THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THE CURRENT LITIGATION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. FURTHER INFORMATION OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CHAD F. KENNEY ON 7/30/21. 7/30/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE. (amas, ) |
MAILED OUT ORDER ENTRY #3 TO PETITIONER ON 7/12/21. (jaa, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER THAT THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNED TO THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS THE HONORABLE SCOTT W. REID. SIGNED BY CLERK OF COURT KATE BARKMAN, CLERK OF COURT ON 7/9/21. 7/9/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(amas, ) |
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number PPE229149 (rf, ) |
PLEADING #2 MAILED TO PRO SE (JL) |
Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (bw, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JACQUIN JOHN CARR. (NO FEE PAID; NO IFP FILED)(bw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.