ROBERTO JIMENEZ v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
ROBERTO JIMENEZ |
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PROMECO, S.A. de C.V., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI SA, PATHEON MANUFACTURING SERVICES LLC, CHATTEM, INC. and RITE AID CORPORATION |
5:2021cv04481 |
October 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
P.I.: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CASE TRANSFERRED VIA CM/ECF TO SOUTHER DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (rf, ) |
Filing 28 ORDER LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. ACTIONS ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FOR INCLUSION IN THE COORDINATED OR CONSOLIDATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER 28 USC 1407 BEING CONDUCTED BY THE HONORABLE ROBIN L. ROSENBERG (rf, ) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by RITE AID CORPORATION, Certificate of Service. Appearance of WILLIAM BURTON, and Withdrawal of Gregory J. Mann.(BURTON, WILLIAM) Modified on 11/5/2021 (md, ). |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT ALL MATTERS IN THIS CASE ARE STAYED UNTIL THE PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ISSUES A DECISION REGARDING THE TRANSFER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 9) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SHOULD THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ISSUE A DECISION DECLINING TO TRANSFER THIS ACTION, PLAINTIFF MAY REASSERT THE MOTION TO REMAND. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 11/2/21.11/2/21 ENTERED AND COPIES (MAILED TO UNREPS) E-MAILED.(er, ) |
Filing 25 MOTION BRAND DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONSIDER REASSIGNMENT filed by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION, CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #9 MOTION to Remand filed by ROBERTO JIMENEZ. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(FINKEN, TRACY) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Remand filed by CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 22 Original Record together with certified copy of docket entries received from Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. (sg, ) |
Filing 21 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH,Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation with Certificate Of Service by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC..(FAHEY, SEAN) |
Filing 20 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by RITE AID CORPORATION.(MANN, GREGORY) |
MAILED DOC. 19. TO UNREPS. (er, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND [DOC. 4] IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND BY OCTOBER 28, 2021. THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR A STAY [DOC. 5] IS DENIED. THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER IS EXTENDED TO A LATER DATE TO BE DETERMINED SHOULD PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR REMAND (DOC. NO. 9) BE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/18/21.10/18/21 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO UNREPS), E-MAILED.(er, ) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Remand . RESPONSES DUE BY 10/28/2021. (er, ) |
Filing 18 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Stay filed by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION, CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC. (SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by JONATHAN WOY on behalf of PFIZER, INC. with Certificate of Service(WOY, JONATHAN) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by SARAH E. KALMAN on behalf of CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC (KALMAN, SARAH) |
Filing 15 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by PFIZER, INC..(FINLEY, STEPHEN) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN J. FINLEY on behalf of PFIZER, INC. with Certificate of Service(FINLEY, STEPHEN) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay filed by ROBERTO JIMENEZ. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(FINKEN, TRACY) |
Filing 12 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Sanofi with Certificate of Service by CHATTEM, INC..(EISENSTEIN, ILANA) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Sanofi with Certificate of Service by SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC.(EISENSTEIN, ILANA) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including Sanofi with Certificate of Service by SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC..(EISENSTEIN, ILANA) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Remand filed by ROBERTO JIMENEZ.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(FINKEN, TRACY) |
Filing 8 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by RITE AID CORPORATION. (MANN, GREGORY) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by GREGORY J. MANN on behalf of RITE AID CORPORATION (MANN, GREGORY) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Expedite Briefing Schedule and Ruling on Plaintiffs Upcoming Motion to Remand filed by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION, CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC. (SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Stay filed by BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM USA CORPORATION, CHATTEM, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, PFIZER, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC.Certificate of Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Expedite Briefing Schedule and Ruling on Plaintiffs Upcoming Motion to Remand filed by ROBERTO JIMENEZ.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(FINKEN, TRACY) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including GlaxoSmithKline plc by GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC..(SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 including GlaxoSmithKline plc by GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.(SACHSE, WILL) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, PFIZER, INC., CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-15469985), filed by GLAXOSMITHKLINE HOLDINGS (AMERICAS) INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, PFIZER, INC., CHATTEM, INC., SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Designation Form)(SACHSE, WILL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.