JOHNSON v. KELLOGG COMPANY et al
RICKY JOHNSON |
KELLOGG COMPANY and AFIMAC GLOBAL, INC. |
5:2022cv04199 |
October 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
JOSEPH F LEESON |
Civil Rights: Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 INITIAL PROCEDURAL ORDER OF 10/20/22. SIGNED BY JUDGE: JOSEPH F. LEESON JR ON 10/20/22. 10/20/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (DT) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by RICKY JOHNSON Designation Form (MARTOCCIO, GARY) |
Attorneys are required by local rule to complete and file both a Civil Cover Sheet and a Designation Form. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file COMPLETED Designation Form in this case using the Notice (Other) docket event located in the Notices category. The Yes/No boxes need to be checked off. (sbt) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AFIMAC GLOBAL, INC., KELLOGG COMPANY. Forwarded To: Counsel on 10/19/22 (dt) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by RICKY JOHNSON. (dt) |
Filing 2 Statement Disclosure Statement Form pursuant to FRCP 7.1 by Ricky Johnson. (MARTOCCIO, GARY) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number APAEDC-16256093.), filed by Ricky Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form)(MARTOCCIO, GARY) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.