RIOS v. BERKS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES et al
| JACQUELINE RIOS |
| BERKS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES and REBECCA MILL |
| 5:2024cv05235 |
| September 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| JEFFREY L SCHMEHL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. THE COMPLAINT IS DEEMED FILED. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR THE REASONS IN THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND RIOS A BLANK COPY OF THIS COURT'S CURRENT STANDARD FORM, ETC. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/24/24. 10/24/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED WITH FORM.(er)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY DISTRICT JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/24/24. 10/24/24 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE. (er) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (MAILED TO PRO SE ALONG WITH E-CONSENT FORM) (Attachments: #1 E-CONSENT)(er) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/2/2024) (er). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against BERKS COUNTY CHILDREN & YOUTH SERVICES, REBECCA MILL, filed by JACQUELINE RIOS. (IFP PENDING). (er) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT filed by JACQUELINE RIOS..(er) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
