Fratti v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 1:2006cv01573
Filed: August 14, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Presiding Judge: J. Andrew Smyser
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1)Pltf's objections to the R&R are SUSTAINED; 2)The Court declines to adopt the R&R insofar as it is inconsistent w/ this Memo & Order; 3)Dft's 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 4)P ltf's 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED: Dft SHALL PAY TO PLAINTIFF (a) Appropriate long term disability benefits as of April 1, 2005, and continuing for so long as pltf remains disabled and (b) pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate on all past due long term disability benefits owed to pltf. The Clerk of Cour is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on September 30, 2008. SEE MEMO FOR DETAILS. (sc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fratti v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?