Allen v. Warden of Dauphin County Jail et al
Artie J Allen |
Warden of Dauphin County Jail, Medical Supervisor at Dauphin County Jail, Doctor and Block Officers |
1:2007cv01720 |
September 21, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Dauphin |
Christopher C. Conner |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the magistrate judge 45 , granting defendants' motions for summary judgment 34 & 37 , directing Clrk of Ct to enter JUDGMENT for defts & against pltf on all claims, & directing Clrk of Ct to CLOSE case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/25/09. (ki ) |
Filing 44 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS/ORDER REFERRINC CASE to Mag. Judge J. Andrew Smyser. It is ORDERED that: 1. The R&R of the mag. judge 42 is ADOPTED. 2. The claims against defts. Block Officers are DISMISSED. 3. The above-capt. matter is REMANDED to the mag. judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 7/23/09. (am) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defts' motion to dismiss 10 - motion GRANTED w/ re: pltf's due process claim - motion otherwise DENIED; pretrial schedule to issue under separate order of ct. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 09/29/08. (ki) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.