Ozoroski v. Beard et al
| Stanley N. Ozoroski |
| Jeffery A. Beard, Frederick R. Maue, John S Reidell, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., David E. Rowe, Prison Health Services, Adam A. Edelman, Marva Cerullo, Ceclia Velasquez, Chris Cantey and Gaudenzia, DRC |
| 1:2008cv00082 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Harrisburg Office |
| Dauphin |
| Christopher C. Conner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: report of the magistrate judge 162 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Report of magistrate judge 162 ADOPTED in part & REJECTED in part as follows: a. REJECTED w/ re: assertion that no deft other than Prison Healt Svcs addre ssed pltf's retaliation claim, b. ADOPTED in all other respects.; 2. Defts' MSJs 92 , 98 , 100 & 101 GRANTED.; 3. Pltf's motion 146 to quash expt rpt of defts Prison Health Svcs & Dr. Adam Edelman DENIED as MOOT.; 4. Clrk of Ct directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of defts & to CLOSE case. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/31/11. (ki)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying defendants' motion to strike 139 & noting no further summary judgment briefing shall be permitted absent receipt of court approval pursuant to L.R. 7.7. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/09/10. (ki )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER denying defendants' motion 79 to dismiss 3rd amended complaint. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 11/10/09. (ki)
|
|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss 71 - 1. Motion to dismiss 71 3rd amended complaint GRANTED w/ re: all claims filed against Gaudenzia, DRC, & DENIED in all other respects.; 2. Clrk of Ct to terminate Gaudenzia as named deft. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 07/10/09. (ki)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re: pltf's letter 66 - It is hereby ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(m), defts Dr. John S. Reidell & Dr. David E. Rowe are DISMISSED from matter without prejudice. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/19/09. (ki)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff's 3rd amended complaint 65 is STRICKEN - Pltf may refile a 3rd amended complaint that comports w/ the memo & order of ct 63 dated 2/18/09. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 03/16/09. (ki)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: motions to dismiss 35 , 37 , 47 & 33 - It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Motion to dismiss 35 by Wexford Health Sources, Inc., DENIED.; 2. Motion to dismiss 35 by Dr. Maue & Marva Cerullo GRANTED in part & DENIED in par t... (see Paras 2a & 2b for specifics).; 3. Motion to dismiss 37 by Gaudenzia, DRC, Cecilia Velasquez & Cheryl Cantey GRANTED - leave to amend granted per Para 5.; 4. Motion to dismiss 47 by Prison Health Svcs, Inc & Dr. Edelman DENIED.; 5. Pltf may file amended complaint by 3/18/09... (see Paras 5a, 5b & 5c for specifics).; 6. By 3/18/09 pltf shall show cause why claims against Dr. Reidell & Dr. Rowe should not be dismissed for failure to effect svc...; 7. Pretrial stay imposed per order 59 LIFTED.; 8. Revised pretrial/trial schedule to issue by future order. (See memo & order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 02/18/09. (ki)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
