Funk v. Custer et al
Gerald Funk |
Charles Custer, David A. Varano, Stanish, John Dunn and Jeffrey A. Beard, |
1:2010cv00915 |
April 29, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Adams |
Yvette Kane |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 109 ORDER TERMINATING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Pltf's mtn for vol dismissal is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Dfts' mtn for sumjgm is MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Nov. 14, 2012. (sc) |
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 79 Joint MOTION for Protective Order is DENIED. 2)Within 30 days from this order, Dfts shall provide plaintiff w/ responses to the disc requests served on or about Nov. 18, 2011. 3)Dfts pending 80 81 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment are DENIED without prejudice to renew following the conclusion of discovery in this matter. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on June 28,2012. (sc) |
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1)Pltfs 43 Motion for Declaratory Judgment is DENIED. 2)Pltf's 48 Motion to Compel is GRANTED to the extent Corrections Dfts are directed to respond to all outstanding discovery requests w/i 20 days from the date of this order. 3)All disc shall be completed w/e 60 days from the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on Sept. 12, 2011. SEE ORDER. (sc) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 23 MOTION to Partially Dismiss Amended Complaint is GRANTED. All clms set forth against Correction Dfts in their official capacities for money damages are DISMISSED as well as clms set for agains t Dft Beard in this action. All other clms set forth in the complt against the Corrections Dfts, with the exception of Beard, will proceed. 2)The 18 MOTION to Dismiss is DENIED. 3)W/i 20 days from the date of this order, Dfts shall file an answer to all clms remaining against them in the complt. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on March 31, 2011. SEE ORDER. (sc) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 1) Defendants' motion for extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions (Doc. No. 36) is GRANTED, and the responses submitted by Defendants to the outstanding discovery a re deemed timely. 2) Plaintiff's motion to strike and dismiss Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with a copy of Defendants' brief in support of their motion to dis miss (Doc. No. 28). 3) Plaintiff may file a supplement to his brief in opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss within fourteen (14) days if he so desires. 4) Plaintiff's nunc pro tunc motion to exceed the page limitation in his brief in support of motion for injunctive relief (Doc. No. 35) is GRANTED. The memorandum of law submitted by Plaintiff on 9/28/10, is accepted by the Court. 5) Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time until 11/15/10, to serve on Defendants a copy of his motion for preliminary injunctive relief and supporting documents (Doc. No. 38) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide all defendants with a copy of Plaitiff's motion for injunctive relief and documents in support thereof. (Doc. Nos. 32-34.) 6) Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief. Signed by Chief Judge Yvette Kane on 12/06/10. (pjr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.