Douglas v. Lanier et al
||Nigel Nicholas Douglas
||Lanier, Buschman, Chopra, Holtzapple, Craig, Duty and McDonald
||February 22, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||William W. Caldwell
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1331
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 11, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2013, it is ordered that: 1. The BOP Defendants Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment 30 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of defendants Buschman, Craig, Du ttry, Holtzapple, Lanier and McDonald and against plaintiff Douglas on all claims. 2. Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 33 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery 34 is DENIED. 4. Within twenty-one (21) day s of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file with the court sufficient information for theMarshal to effect service on defendant Dr. Chopra. If Plaintiff fails to do so, this action will be dismissed as against Dr. Chopra. (See memo for complete details.) Signed by Honorable William W. Caldwell on 9/11/13. (am)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?