Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust
||Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Game Commission
||Thomas E. Proctor Heirs Trust
||August 10, 2012
||US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
||Christopher C. Conner
|Nature of Suit:
||All Other Real Property
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 26, 2017
ORDER: 1. The report 77 of Chief M.J. Schwab is ADOPTED in its entirety.2. Pltfs mtn 67 to dismiss dfts counterclaim or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement or to strike certain paragraphs of said pleading is DENIED.3. The above-captioned matter is REMANDED to Chief M.J. Schwab for further pretrial management. Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/26/17. (ma)
|July 24, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT of Magistrate Judge Schwab 24 in its entirety, GRANTING deft's motion to dismiss 14 to extent it seeks dismissal of pltf's claim to quiet title pursuant to PaRCP 1061(b)(2), DISMissing pltf's claim pursuant to PaRCP 1061(b)(2) with prejudice, motion 14 DENIED in all other respects, & REMANDING case to Magistrate Judge Schwab for pretrial management. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 7/24/14. (ki)
|July 18, 2013
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Schwab 11 , granting deft's MTD 6 , DISMISSING pltf's complaint 1 w/out prejudice & directing deft to respond to amended complaint 12 pursuant to Local Rules. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 7/18/2013. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?