Rivera v. McCoy
Plaintiff: Michael Rivera
Defendant: R. McCoy
Case Number: 1:2015cv02089
Filed: October 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Luzerne
Presiding Judge: EC
Presiding Judge: John E. Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) 1. The motion (Doc. 26) for summary judgment is GRANTED.2. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment against Plaintiffand in favor of Defendant McCoy.3. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case.4. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith.See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (eo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rivera v. McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rivera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?