CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Pennsylvania State Police
Plaintiff: CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Pennsylvania State Police
Case Number: 1:2015cv02147
Filed: November 10, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Christopher C. Conner
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 65 ; 1. Dfts mtn 45 for summary jgmnt is GRANTED as to pltfs constitutional claims at Counts III and IV and is otherwise DENIED.2. Pltfs mtn 49 for summary jgmnt is DENIED.3. Jgmnt is ENTERED in favor of dfts in accord with pgrph 1 above.4. Pltfs claim for declaratory judgment under the federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, is DISMISSED without prejudice to pltfs right to reframe and reinstate the claim under the Pennsylva nia Declaratory Judgments Act, 42 CONS. STAT. § 7531 et seq.5. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over pltfs remaining claim under Pennsylvanias Religious Freedom Protection Act, 71 PA. STAT. AND CONS. STAT. ANN. §§ 2401-07.6. This matter is REMANDED to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.7. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 9/19/17. (ma)
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER (Memorandum 21 filed previously as separate docket entry) granting CBM's motion 8 for prelim inj conditioned upon posting bond or security of $250 w/ Clrk of Ct, prelim enjoining defts from enforcing against CBM all PA Code provi sions promulgated under 75 PA.CONS.STAT. 4551 which regulate school bus safety & noting injunction shall continue in effect pending entry of jdgmt in case. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner on 12/2/15. (ki)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Pennsylvania State Police
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania
Represented By: David W. Crossett
Represented By: Randall L. Wenger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Represented By: Timothy P. Keating
Represented By: Sharon K. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pennsylvania State Police
Represented By: Timothy P. Keating
Represented By: Sharon K. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?