WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
Plaintiff: Mark-Alonzo Williams
Defendant: John Wetzel, Michael Klopotoski, Michael Mahally, Vincent Mooney, Joseph Zakarauskas, Norman Demming, Pall and Joseph Fye
Case Number: 1:2017cv00079
Filed: January 13, 2017
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
County: Outside State
Presiding Judge: GS
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H. Rambo
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 176 ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 175 : 1. Pltfs mtns for leave to amend 156 and 157 his bropp 154 and 155 are GRANTED;2. Dfts mtn for summary judgment 140 is GRANTED;3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Dfts and against Pltiff Mark-Alonzo Williams with respect to all claims raised in Pltfs second amended complaint; and4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE the above-captioned case.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 2/6/20. (ma)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) in accordance with theaccompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs motion to alterjudgment (Doc. No. 143) is DENIED. (eo)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER - In accord with the accompnaying Memorandum 133 : 1.Pltfs mtn for injunction and sanctions 126 is DENIED. To the extent Pltf seeks the apptmnt of cnsl, the mtn is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;2.Pltfs mtn to compel discovery 129 is DENIED AS MOOT; and3.The parties are reminded that any dispositive mtns are due on or before 9/30/19. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/29/19. (ma)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER - In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 124 : 1. Pltfs mtn for leave to file a brsupp of his mtn to order court sanctions and fines 113 is GRANTED;2. Dfts mtn for an exttm to file a response 119 is GRANTED, and their bropp (Doc. No. 1 22) is DEEMED timely filed;3. Pltfs mtn to clarify 121 is GRANTED to the extent that this Order and the accompanying Memorandum serve as the clarification Pltf seeks;4. Pltfs mtns for court sanctions and fines 111 and 115 are DENIED;5. Pltfs re maining mtns 107 109 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:a. The discovery period is REOPENED for (30) days from the date of this Order. Pltfs mtns 107, 109) are GRANTED to the extent that, within that (30)-day period, Dfts are DIRE CTED to produce to Pltf:i. Responses to the interrogatories posed to Dft Klopotoski;ii. Documents in response to Pltfs request regarding his parole packet in 2014; andiii. Copies of the 2014 and 2015 DOC policies regarding inmate transfers and staff retaliation that are relevant to Pltfs requests;b. Pltfs request for summary judgment to be entered in his favor is DEEMED withdrawn;c. Pltfs mtns (Doc. Nos. 107, 109) are DENIED in all other aspects; and6. The parties are DIRECTED to file any dispositive mtns they may wish to file within (90) days of the date of this Order.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/2/19. (ma)
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM ORDER re: 93 MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Mark-Alonzo Williams. It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion to compel (Doc. is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on March 14, 2019. (kjn)
April 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 72 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for reconsideration of the Courts denial of his motion for preliminary injunction and tro 59 , is DENIED as moot;2. Pltfs mtn to amend his bropp to Dfts mtn to dismiss 70 , is con strued as a sur-reply brief to Dfts reply brief 64 , and is GRANTED insofar as itis construed as a sur-reply brief;3. Pltfs mtn for a more definite statement 71 , is DENIED as moot;4. Dfts mtn to dismiss Pltfs second amended complaint 61 , is DENIED; and5. Dfts, within (20) days from the date of this Order, shall respond or otherwise plead to Pltffs second amended complaint 52 .Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 4/5/18. (ma)
September 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 50 ; 1. Pltfs mtn for release from SMU 40 is DENIED;2. Pltfs mtn for leave to file an amended complaint 42 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall DOCKET the second amended complaint [63-1] as a sep arate entry on the docket of this action. Dfts shall answer or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint in accordance with the requirements set forth in the FRCP and the LRs of this Court. Pltf, in accord with Rule 4 of the FRCP, shall make arrangements to effect service of the second amended complaint on the newly added Dft as required by the Rules of this Court;3. Pltfs motion seeking service forms 43 is GRANTED insofar as the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide Pltf with the appr opriate forms to serve the newly added Dft;4. Dfts mtn to dismiss 23 is DENIED without prejudice as moot;5. Pltfs mtn for an exttm to file a bropp to Dfts mtn to dismiss 44 is DENIED as moot; and6. Pltfs mtn for a preliminary injunction 48 ) is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 9/26/17. (ma)
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Pltf's "motion requesting proof" 34 is DENIED as MOOT.; 2. Pltf's "motion for miscellaneous facts" 36 & motions "for release from SMU" 37 & 38 are DENIED for same rea sons in ct's 7/18/17 memo & order 32 33 .; 3. Pltf's "motion for order" 35 is GRANTED to extent that pltf is not being given access to his legal mat'ls which may have impeded his ability to file br in opp to defts' MTD.; 4. Pltf shall file br in opp to defts' MTD 23 w/in 30 days of date of this order. (See order for complete details.) Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 8/15/17. (ki)
July 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: In accord with the accompanying Memorandum 32 ; Pltfs mtn for apreliminary injunction and temporary restraining order 29 is DENIED.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/18/17. (ma)
January 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and TRANSFER forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on January 11, 2017. (kcc) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 1/13/2017.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark-Alonzo Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Klopotoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Mahally
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent Mooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Zakarauskas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norman Demming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Fye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?