Price v. Williams et al
Donnell Price |
W. Ted Williams, Hans Reisinger, Ficks, Doll, Gray, Bainbridge, Alexander, Lechner, Haldman, M. Garman and John Wetzel |
1:2018cv00583 |
March 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Harrisburg Office |
Centre |
RM |
Yvette Kane |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 74 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry 73 - AND NOW, on this 15th day of June 2020, in accordance with the Memorandum issued concurrently with this Order, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 68) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Williams, Gray, Alexander, Lechner, Haldman, Garman, and Wetzel and against Plaintiff Donnell Price as to all claims asserted against Defendants; 3. Defendants motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Doc. No. 71) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned action.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 6/15/20. (dmn) |
Filing 54 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)- IT IS ORDERED THAT: Defendants Doll and Reisingers motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 50) is GRANTED; ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND AO 398 AND 399 WAIVERS FORMS as to Deft Bainbridge. See order for further details. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 4/16/2019. (ve) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.