Alvarez v. Ebbert et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Alvarez
Defendant: Officer/Counselor Tharp, SIS Officer Buebendorf and Warden David J. Ebbert
Case Number: 1:2018cv01964
Filed: October 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Harrisburg Office
Presiding Judge: RM
Referring Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Christopher Alvarez.(bg)
December 7, 2018 Filing 13 U.S. MARSHAL - 285, AO 398 and AO 399 Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (bg)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting pltf's mtn for exttm #10 . Pltf may file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/8/18. (ma)
November 5, 2018 Filing 11 Letter/Request from Christopher Alvarez, Re: Forms (ga)
November 5, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time of Thirty (30) days to submit Amended Complaint by Christopher Alvarez.(ga)
October 11, 2018 Filing 9 STANDING PRACTICE ORDER informing the parties of their briefing and other responsibilities. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/11/18. (Attachments: #1 285 Service Packet with IFP Notice)(dmn)
October 11, 2018 Filing 8 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) - AND NOW, on this 10th day of October 2018, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiffs motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 2), is DENIED; 2. Plaintiff Wilsons motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 (Doc. No. 63), is DENIED as moot; 3. Plaintiff Raileys motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc.No. 65), is DENIED without prejudice; 4. Plaintiff Raileys motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 68), is DENIED; 5. Plaintiff Raileys motion to sever party from action (Doc. No. 81), is GRANTED as follows: a. The claims of Plaintiff Nathan Railey will proceed under this matter, No. 18-cv-716; b. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open the claims of Plaintiffs Camden Barlow, Christopher Alvarez, Terrell Wilson, Doreteo Garcia, and Juan C. Valles in new, individual actions. The original filing date of Plaintiffs claims will be preserved; c. The complaint (Doc. No. 1), the respective prisoner authorization forms and administrative orders (Doc. Nos. 10, 20, 22, 34, 37, 43-45, 47, 48), waivers of service forms (Doc. Nos. 40, 55), and copyof this Memorandum and Order will be docketed in each individual Plaintiffs action; d. Each Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within thirty (30)days from the date of this Order. If a Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time prescribed herein, the Court will direct Defendants to respond to the remaining First Amendment mail interference/enhancement claim as set forth in the original complaint (Doc. No. 1); and 6. Defendants motion to stay the proceedings (Doc. No. 83), is DENIED as moot.Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/10/18. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 10/10/18. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned 8/12/18. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 4 Waiver of Service forms (AO 398 and 399) Mailed to All Defendants 7/24/18. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER sent to Prison Superintendent/Warden on 7/27/18. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 2 PRISONER AUTHORIZATION by Christopher Alvarez allowing prison to submit copy of prisoner's trust fund account to the court, and approving the entire filing fee to be deducted from prisoner inmate account. (dmn)
October 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Christopher Alvarez. Complaint was originally lodged on 4/2/18 and deemed filed when IFP was granted on 7/24/18.(dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarez v. Ebbert et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer/Counselor Tharp
Represented By: Justin J. Blewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SIS Officer Buebendorf
Represented By: Justin J. Blewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden David J. Ebbert
Represented By: Justin J. Blewitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Alvarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?