Ward v. White
| Matthew Ward |
| Douglas K. White |
| 1:2019cv00787 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Martin C Carlson |
| Yvette Kane |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged with Motion for IFP) filed by Matthew Ward - IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Petitions be DENIED without prejudice to renewal once this dispute becomes ripe, and that a certificate of appealability should not issue. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 26, 2019. (kjn) |
VERBAL ORDER by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner - Case Reassigned to Honorable Yvette Kane and Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson Jr as one or more parties have not consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (jw)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER - MJ Consent reply due: 6/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on June 7, 2019. (kjn)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT FORM SENT (For Direct Assignment Cases to Magistrate Judges) to Matthew Ward, Douglas K. White YOU MUST SAVE THIS FORM TO YOUR DESKTOP. THEN OPEN THE SAVED FORM AND COMPLETE THE REQUIRED SECTIONS. DO NOT FILE THIS FORM IN THE CLERKS OFFICE. THE FORM MUST BE E-MAILED TO consents@pamd.uscourts.gov OR IF YOU ARE NOT AN ECF REGISTERED USER, THEN MAIL THE FORM TO Clerks Administrative Assistant, Clerks Office, P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, PA 18501-1148. Consent Form due by 6/28/2019. (kjn) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Douglas K. White by Douglas K. White. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s), #2 Exhibit(s))(Thiel, G.) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of PWHC and OSC RECEIVED from USAO. (kjn) |
|
Filing 3
Order Granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Matthew Ward. The clerk shall serve a copy of this petition and this order on the Respondent and the Respondent shall show cause on or before June 7, 2019 why the petitioner should not be granted habeas corpus relief. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this Order on the United States Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 13, 2019. (kjn)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Ward.(aaa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Matthew Ward.(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ward v. White | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Matthew Ward | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Douglas K. White | |
| Represented By: | G. Thiel |
| Represented By: | Joseph Terz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
