Olivo-Noble v. Wetzel et al
Petitioner: Jose A. Olivo-Noble
Respondent: John E. Wetzel, PA Attorney General and Kevin Kauffman
Case Number: 1:2019cv00847
Filed: May 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Sylvia H Rambo
Referring Judge: Susan E Schwab
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: 1) The report and recommendation of M.J. Schwab (Doc. 7) #7 is ADOPTED.2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus #1 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 7/12/19. (ma)
June 10, 2019 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged with Motion for IFP) filed by Jose A. Olivo-Noble. Objections to R&R due by 6/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 6/10/2019. (ktt)
June 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 6/10/2019 (ktt)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order VERBAL ORDER by Chief Judge Christopher C. Conner - Case Reassigned to Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo and referred to Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab. (jw)
June 5, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Jose A. Olivo-Noble. (aaa)
May 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that, on or before June 21, 2019, the petitioner shall complete and file the enclosed election form, indicating an election to have the petition construed and ruled upon under 28 U.S.C. ' 2254 or to withdraw the current petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 5/21/2019. (ktt)
May 16, 2019 Filing 3 Prisoner Account Statement by Jose A. Olivo-Noble. (aaa)
May 16, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose A. Olivo-Noble.(aaa)
May 16, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending the disposition of the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Jose A. Olivo-Noble.(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olivo-Noble v. Wetzel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John E. Wetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PA Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kevin Kauffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose A. Olivo-Noble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?