Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
Robert Garfield |
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC., Robert G. Gifford, Lawrence D. Raiman, Fredric J. Tomczyk, David L. Lingerfelt, Thomas C. Deloach, Jr., William P. Hankowsky, Liberty Property Trust, Daniel P. Garton and Marguerite Nader |
1:2020cv00027 |
January 7, 2020 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
John E Jones |
Stockholders Suits |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Robert Garfield (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Harter, Brandon) |
Filing 3 COUNTY COURT RECORD from Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas. (mfa) |
Receipt of payment from LEE BEGELMAN in the amount of $400.00 for CIVIL FILING FEE. Transaction posted on 1/7/2020. Receipt number 111024884 processed by prowe. (jjs) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Liberty Property Trust. (McNally, Laura) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Liberty Property Trust from Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020cv123cv. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 111024884), filed by Liberty Property Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(mfa) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Attorneys Amanda Lashner, Marc Sonnenfeld, Richard Brualdi and are advised that the special admissions form can be found at http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/forms/petition-admission-practice (mfa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.