POM of Pennsylvania, LLC et al v. United Amusement Alternatives et al
Plaintiff: Savvy Dog Systems, LLC and POM of Pennsylvania, LLC trading & doing business as PACE-O-MATIC
Defendant: United Amusement Alternatives, XYZ Companies 1-100 and John Does 1-100
Case Number: 1:2020cv01942
Filed: October 21, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Yvette Kane
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2020 Filing 5 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 10/22/20. (dmn)
October 21, 2020 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Savvy Dog Systems, LLC. (Haverstick, Matthew)
October 21, 2020 Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by POM of Pennsylvania, LLC. (Haverstick, Matthew)
October 21, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa)
October 21, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number APAMDC-5307995), filed by Savvy Dog Systems, LLC, POM of Pennsylvania, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) a, #3 b, #4 c)(aaa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POM of Pennsylvania, LLC et al v. United Amusement Alternatives et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Savvy Dog Systems, LLC
Represented By: James G. Gorman, III
Represented By: Matthew H. Haverstick
Represented By: Shohin Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: POM of Pennsylvania, LLC trading & doing business as PACE-O-MATIC
Represented By: James G. Gorman, III
Represented By: Matthew H. Haverstick
Represented By: Shohin Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Amusement Alternatives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Companies 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-100
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?