Gonzalez v. Howard
Emmanuel Gonzalez |
Catricia Howard |
1:2020cv01992 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
EB |
Sylvia H Rambo |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Catricia Howard by Catricia Howard. (Attachments: #1 Unpublished Opinion(s), #2 Exhibit(s))(Haken, Tamara) |
Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail(Doc. 5) sent to Catricia L. Howard, Superintendent. (dw) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail (Doc. 5) sent to Emmanuel Gonzalez. (dw) |
Filing 7 SHOW CAUSE ORDER and Petition Served on USA office Hbg by personal service (ma) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Petrs mtn for leave to proceed ifp #4 is GRANTED, and his 2241 petn #1 is DEEMED FILED;The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of the petn and this Order on the Respondent and the US Atty, and to note the address of the US Attorney on the front of the docket sheet in this case. Within (20) days of the date of this Order, Resp shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the allegations of the petition. Petr shall, if he so desires, file a reply to the Respondents answer or other pleading within (14) days after its filing. and Signed by Honorable Sylvia H. Rambo on 11/30/20. (ma) |
Filing 5 FIFTEEN (15) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - Within 15 days of the date of this Order, the superintendent or warden of the institution at which Petitioner is currently incarcerated is directed to provide certified copies of the statement of Petitioner's trust fund account to this Court and to the Petitioner. The statement should reflect all activity in that account for the six-month period immediately preceding the lodging of the complaint in this action. Order sent to Superintendent and petitioner. Signed by LP on 11/27/2020. (lp) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Emmanuel Gonzalez.(ao) |
Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the petitioner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Emmanuel Gonzalez.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Howard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Emmanuel Gonzalez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Catricia Howard | |
Represented By: | Tamara J Haken |
Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.