Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 1:2020cv02147 |
| November 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Yvette Kane |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 - AND NOW, on this 14th day of December 2020, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Finding that good cause for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Plaintiff)s request exists and that Plaintiffs request is consistent with precedent, see, e.g., Malibu Media LLC v. Doe, No. 1:14-cv-0166, 2014 WL 575305, at *3-4 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2014), Plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/14/20. (dmn)
|
| Filing 8 EXHIBIT /DECLARATIONS by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re #6 MOTION for Leave to File a Third Party Subpoena. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s))(Saruya, Jason) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBIT A to Complaint by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC re #1 Complaint. (Saruya, Jason) |
| DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to file Exhibit A as referenced in Doc. Nos. 1 and 6. (dmn) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File a Third Party Subpoena by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo, #3 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Saruya, Jason) |
| Filing 5 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 11/19/20. (dmn) |
| Filing 4 Copyright Report sent to Register of Copyright. (mw) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Saruya, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (mw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $400, Receipt Number APAMDC-5349418), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jason M. Saruya |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
