Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
John Doe |
1:2020cv02374 |
December 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Yvette Kane |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC of John Doe with Prejudice (Saruya, Jason) |
Filing 7 ORDER - AND NOW, on this 6th day of January 2021, IT IS ORDERED THAT:1. Finding that good cause for Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (Plaintiff)s request exists and that Plaintiffs request is consistent with precedent, see, e.g., Malibu Media LLC v. Doe, No. 1:14-cv-0166, 2014 WL 575305, at *3-4 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 11, 2014), Plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena prior to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference (Doc. No. #5 ) is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 1/6/21. (dmn) |
Filing 6 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #5 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Subpoena filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A - C)(Saruya, Jason) |
DOCKET ANNOTATION: Counsel is advised to refile their Brief in Support to Document 5 as a separate document. This event is located under Responses and Replies. (aaa) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Third Party Subpoena by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memo, #3 Exhibit(s) A - C, #4 Appendix)(Saruya, Jason) |
Filing 4 Letter to Counsel re: Case Assignment and Procedures.Signed by Honorable Yvette Kane on 12/23/20. (dmn) |
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Saruya, Jason) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John Doe and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve them with the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $402, Receipt Number APAMDC-5392996), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s))(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: John Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jason M. Saruya |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.