Ramdeo v. Spaulding
Sonny Austin Ramdeo |
Stephen Spaulding |
1:2020cv02458 |
December 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
EBC |
John E Jones |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS by Stephen Spaulding by Stephen Spaulding. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Unpublished Opinion(s))(Haken, Tamara) |
Filing 8 Supplement/Addendum by Sonny Austin Ramdeo to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Lodged No FF and No Motion for IFP Filed). (lg) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE- 1.The petition is DEEMED filed. 2.The Clerk of Court is directed to SERVE copies of the petition (Doc. 1), and this Order on Respondent and the United States Attorney. See R. GOVERNING 2254 CASES R.1(b) (applicable to petitions under 28 U.S.C. 2241 in the discretion of the court). All documents filed by the parties and by the Court shall be served upon the United States Attorney.3. Respondent shall FILE, within twenty-one (21) days from the date ofthis Order, an answer to the petition (Doc. 1). See R. GOVERNING 2254 CASES R. 1(b), 5(b)-(d) (explaining required contents of answer and supporting materials). 4.A memorandum of law shall accompany the answer.5. Petitioner is permitted to FILE, within fourteen (14) days of the date on which the answer is filed, a reply to the answer. See R. GOVERNING 2254 CASES R.1(b), 5 (e).6.The Court will decide whether to hold a hearing on the basis of the petition, Respondents answer, and, if filed, Petitioners reply. (eo) |
Receipt of payment from SONNY AUSTIN RAMDEO in the amount of $5.00 for WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Transaction posted on 1/22/2021. Receipt number 333074668 processed by epetrosk. (jjs) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333074668. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ep) |
Filing 5 Letter to Court from Ramdeo re his request to the Warden to pay filing fee. (lg) |
Filing 4 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED w/ Notice & Consent Form. (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent Form) (lg) |
Filing 3 (THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER) directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. (Attachment: #1 IFP Form) (lg) |
Filing 2 DECLARATION in support of Petition by Sonny Austin Ramdeo, pro se. (lg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Sonny Austin Ramdeo, pro se. (Attachment: #1 Expedited Petition) (lg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramdeo v. Spaulding | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding | |
Represented By: | Tamara J Haken |
Represented By: | Joseph J Terz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Sonny Austin Ramdeo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.