Simpson v. Dauphin County Sheriff(s) Dept. et al
Charles A. Simpson, Jr. and Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. |
John Doe, Dauphin County Court Administration, Deborah Freeman, Dauphin County Sheriff(s) Dept., Judge Deborah Curcillo, Meredith Pfundheller and District Attorneys Office Dauphin County |
1:2021cv00894 |
May 17, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Susan E Schwab |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting pltf's application #2 for leave to proceed IFP, granting pltf leave to file amended complaint w/in 28 days of date of this order & noting that if pltf fails to file amended complaint ct will screen original complaint in acc w/ 28 USC 1915(e)(2). (See order for complete details.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan E. Schwab on 7/12/21. (ki) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number. (aaa) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr.(aaa) Modified on 5/20/2021, correct pltf's name (ki). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Chalmers A. Simpson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) Modified on 5/20/2021, correct pltf's name (ki). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.