Ross v. Smith et al
Tarahjay M Ross |
Captain Steve Smith, Lt. Greg Mendenhall, Lt. Richard Armermann, Warden Gregory Briggs, Warden Brian Clark, C.O. John Scott, C.O. Matthew Danner, C.O. Cameron Weaver, C.O. Chaz and C.O. George Bell |
1:2021cv01994 |
November 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
EB |
Yvette Kane |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry). See order for details. (eo) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) (eo) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tarahjay M Ross.(lp) |
Filing 5 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent, #2 Fed & Local Rules) (lp) |
Filing 4 AO 398 and AO 399 Waiver of Service Forms Completed by Plaintiff. (lp) |
Filing 3 UNCERTIFIED Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Tarahjay M Ross. (lp) |
Filing 2 CERTIFIED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tarahjay M Ross.(lp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants lodged pending the disposition of the Motion for In Forma Pauperis, filed by Tarahjay M Ross.(lp) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/23/2021) (lp). (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/23/2021) (lp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.