Scarlett v. Superintendent et al
Richard A. Scarlett |
Superintendent and PA Attorney General |
1:2023cv01042 |
June 23, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
LT |
Christopher C Conner |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to File Answer by PA Attorney General.(Robinson, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Ann Robinson on behalf of Superintendent (Robinson, Jennifer) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Richard A. Scarlett. (dw) |
Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER with Notice of Limitations on Filing of Future Petitions Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. See Order for complete details. Signed by Honorable Christopher C. Conner on 6/29/23. (dmn) |
Receipt of payment from SCI GREENE in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 6/23/2023. Receipt number 333105193 processed by EP. (jjs) |
Filing 3 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 AO 85 Notice & Consent Form) (ea) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Richard A. Scarlett (document is not very clear/legible). (ea) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 333105193), filed by Richard A. Scarlett. (ea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.