Doe v. Noem et al
| Student Doe |
| Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Todd Lyons |
| 1:2025cv00720 |
| April 23, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Keli M Neary |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR SPECIAL ADMISSION (PRO HAC VICE) by Karen L Hoffmann on behalf of Student Doe Attorney Karen Hoffmann is seeking special admission Filing fee $ 50, receipt number APAMDC-6971649.. (Hoffmann, Karen) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants and provided TO ATTORNEY ELECTRONICALLY VIA ECF for service on Defendant(s)in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS RECEIVING THE SUMMONS ELECTRONICALLY: You must print the summons and the attachment when you receive it in your e-mail and serve the complaint on all defendants in the manner prescribed by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). (Attachments: #1 Summons Packet) (aaa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405, Receipt Number APAMDC-6971457), filed by Student Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aaa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
