Heim v. Dauphin County Prison et al
| Joseph Heim |
| Dauphin County Prison, Dominick L. DeRose, Elizabeth Nichols, Leonard Carroll, Prison Board of Inspectors, Every (Single) Member of (will "Amend"), Business Office and Manager of Freddie McNeal |
| 3:2010cv01656 |
| August 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Adams |
| PT |
| A. Richard Caputo |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER re 63 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry),It is ORDERED that:1.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 46) is GRANTED.2.The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants Dauphin County Prison; th e Prison Board of Inspectors; Warden DeRose, Deputy Warden Nichols, Deputy Warden Carroll, Business Manager McNeal and the Business Office; and against Plaintiff Joseph Heim.3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/1/13. (jam)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for specific details. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/31/11 (jam, )
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying 19 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/4/11 (jam, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
