ASD Specialty Healthcare Inc. v. New Life Home Care Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
ASD Specialty Healthcare Inc. |
Defendant: |
New Life Home Care Inc. and Gregory Malia |
Case Number: |
3:2011cv00068 |
Filed: |
January 10, 2011 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Scranton Office |
County: |
Luzerne |
Presiding Judge: |
A. Richard Caputo |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Jury Demanded By: |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 22, 2013 |
Filing
84
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) that the defts' motion to vacate judgment is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/22/13. (bs)
|
April 10, 2013 |
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM re 70 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs and Request for Sanctions for Defendants' Failure to Comply with Court Orders filed by ASD Specialty Healthcare Inc. (order to follow).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/10/13. (bs)
|
February 1, 2012 |
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM re 41 MOTION for Default Judgment as to the claims against New Life Home Care, Inc. based on the Court's October 21, 2011 Order filed by ASD Specialty Healthcare Inc. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/1/12. (jam, )
|
November 29, 2011 |
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Dismiss; denying 29 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Defendant Gregory Malias motion to dismiss the amended complaint is DENIED.2. Pla intiff has failed to properly serve Defendant Gregory Malia. Plaintiff must perfect service within twenty-one (21) days of this order.3. Plaintiffs motion to dismiss Defendant New Life Home Care Inc.s counterclaims is GRANTED in part and DENIED in p art. Counts I and III alleging fraudulent concealment and fraud, misrepresentation and deceit are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendant is granted leave to amend in order to specify timely fraud allegations and/or allege with particularity any price inflation fraud claims. Defendant has twenty-one (21) days to amend or the claims will be dismissed with prejudice.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 11/29/11 (jam, )
|
January 19, 2011 |
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order, the plaintiff may file and amended complaint. 2. The plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/19/2011. (cw, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?