Otis et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Jason Otis and Janet Otis
Defendant: Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Nomac Drilling, LLC
Case Number: 3:2011cv00115
Filed: January 18, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Bradford
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER withdrawing 44 Motion to Dismiss; granting 46 Motion to Withdraw it; Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 6/12/17 (ep)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 41 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 35 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/21/15 (jam)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER re 23 Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry), Memorandum (Order to follow as separate docket entry) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Relief from the Cour ts Order to Stay Pending Arbitration (Doc. 14) is DENIED.(2) Defendants Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing and for Leave to Conduct Limited Pre-Hearing Discovery (Doc. 17) is DENIED as moot.(3) The action is STAYED until arbitration is completed.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 5/10/12. (jam, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otis et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Otis
Represented By: Richard J. Arsenault
Represented By: Daniel E. Becnel
Represented By: Peter J. Cambs
Represented By: Michael Gleeson
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet Otis
Represented By: Richard J. Arsenault
Represented By: Daniel E. Becnel
Represented By: Peter J. Cambs
Represented By: Michael Gleeson
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC
Represented By: Anthony R. Holtzman
Represented By: David R. Overstreet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chesapeake Energy Corporation
Represented By: Anthony R. Holtzman
Represented By: David R. Overstreet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nomac Drilling, LLC
Represented By: Anthony R. Holtzman
Represented By: David R. Overstreet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?