<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Bailey v. Forostiak et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:03:38 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 03:03:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Bailey v. Forostiak et al - Case Documents</description>
             
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 284]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642/284
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), 1.Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Court may reconsider its dismissal should Plaintiff provide his updated address within a reasonable time period.2.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.ORDER TERMINATING CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/31/20. (bs)
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642/284
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 31 Mar 2020 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 252]]>
                    </title>
                    <link>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642/252
            </link>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Bailey has also not satisfied his burden of proof of establishing all the essential elements required to succeed with respect to his surviving claims. Furthermore, Defendants have provided argumen ts and counter facts which also undernine Baileys vague partial summary judgment argument. Consequently, based on an application of the well settled Rule 56 standards, Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment will be denied. re 118 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Ari Bailey Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 3/6/18. (cc)
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid>
                https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pamdce/3:2011cv00577/84642/252
            </guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
