Dansbury et al v. EOG Resources, Inc.
Plaintiff: Arthur M Dansbury, Joan M Dansbury, Arthur B. Dansbury and Nancy L Dansbury
Defendant: EOG Resources, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2012cv00391
Filed: March 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Bradford
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 52), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT such Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. The references to the original and First Revise d Unit Designations are STRICKEN from Count II; 2. Count VI is WITHDRAWN by request of the Plaintiffs; and 3. With the exception of the modifications ordered above, the Third Amended Complaint SHALL CONSTITUTE the operative and final Complaint in this action. No further amendments will be permitted without leave of court. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/29/15. (jfg)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER 1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. The Slander of Title claim (Count II) is: i. DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to the letter of June 21,2011; and ii. ALLOWED TO PROCEED as it ref ers to Defendant's filing of the unit designations with the Recorder of Deeds. b. The Breach of Contract claim (Count III) is:I. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to: 1. Defendant's failure to make delay rental payments, and 2. Defendant's failure to submit a proper notice of consolidation; and II. ALLOWED TO PROCEED as it refers to: 1.Defendant's failure to test Plaintiffs' water supply, and 2. Defendant's breaches of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and the doctrine of necessary implication. c. The Unjust Enrichment claim (Count V) is ALLOWED TO PROCEED. d. Any other aspect of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint not specifically enumerated in this Order is ALLOWED TO PROCEED. 2. P laintiffs are GRANTED ADDITIONAL LEAVE TO AMEND to: a. Reallege the dismissed aspects of their Breach of Contract claim under a proper cause of action, and b. Add any additional claims that the Court's Memorandum Opinion makes necessary. 3. Plaintiff shall have FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Order to submit a Third Amended Complaint.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/13/14. (jfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dansbury et al v. EOG Resources, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur M Dansbury
Represented By: William S. Friedlander
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Represented By: Taunya M Rosenbloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joan M Dansbury
Represented By: William S. Friedlander
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Represented By: Taunya M Rosenbloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur B. Dansbury
Represented By: William S. Friedlander
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Represented By: Taunya M Rosenbloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy L Dansbury
Represented By: William S. Friedlander
Represented By: Todd J. O'Malley
Represented By: Taunya M Rosenbloom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EOG Resources, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?