Botey v. Green et al
Plaintiff: |
Jonathan A. Botey |
Defendant: |
Robert D. Green, Conwell Corporation and FFE Transportation Services, Inc. |
Counterclaim_plaintiff: |
Conwell Corporation, Robert D. Green and FFE Transportation Services, Inc. |
Counterclaim_defendant: |
Jonathan A. Botey |
Case Number: |
3:2012cv01520 |
Filed: |
August 6, 2012 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Office: |
Scranton Office |
County: |
Lackawanna |
Presiding Judge: |
Robert D. Mariani |
Nature of Suit: |
Motor Vehicle |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 14, 2018 |
Filing
373
ORDER denying 340 Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 11/14/18 (jam)
|
June 9, 2017 |
Filing
301
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow)Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/9/2017. (rm)
|
June 8, 2017 |
Filing
297
ORDER 1. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude the Use of Demonstrative Evidence Showing Plaintiffs Facial Injuries (Doc. 170) is RESERVED UNTIL TIME OF TRIAL. 2. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude Improper "Reptile Theory&qu ot; Tactics (Doc. 166) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Defendants' Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiff, his Counsel, Witnesses and any Experts 'from Referring to Robert Green as a"Professional Driver" and Further Precluding tho se Individuals from Stating or Inferring that Robert Green or any Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver is Subject to an Increased or Higher Standard of Care (Doc. 176) is GRANTED IN PART AND RESERVED IN PART as follows: a. Defendants' motion to precl ude plaintiff, his counsel, witnesses and any experts from referring to Robert Green as a"professional driver" is GRANTED.b. Defendants' request that Plaintiff's counsel and witnesses be precluded from stating or inferring that Green or any commercial motor vehicle driver is subject to an increased or higher standard of care is RESERVED UNTIL TIME OF TRIAL.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/8/17. (jfg)
|
October 27, 2016 |
Filing
131
ORDER 1. The R&R (Doc. 125) is ADOPTED, for the reasons discussed therein as well as those discussed in this Court's accompanying memorandum opinion. 2.Defendants' Objections (Doc. 126) are OVERRULED. 3. Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 103) is DENIED. 4. A telephone conference to schedule this action for trial shall be held on Tuesday, November 1, 2016, at 11:00 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for arranging the call to (570) 207-5750, and all parties should be ready to proceed before the undersigned is contacted. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/27/16. (jfg)
|
April 4, 2016 |
Filing
124
ORDER THAT Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Spoliation of Evidence (Doc. 74) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, to wit: 1. Plaintiffs request that an adverse inference jury instruction be read against Defendants at the time of trial is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs request that Defendants be precluded from arguing in dispositive motions that Plaintiff lacks evidence to prove his corporate negligence claims against Defendants FFE and Conwell based on the documents destroyed is GRANTED in so far as Defendants are precluded from proving the contents of the destroyed documents by other means or argue their contents in dispositive motions or at trial.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 4/4/16. (jfg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?