Harriott v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
| Horace Harriott, Jr. |
| PA Attorney General, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole |
| 3:2012cv02534 |
| December 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Lackawanna |
| JV |
| Richard P. Conaboy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM Since Petitioner has not establshed entitlement to either statutory or equitable tolling and his 2254 petition was filed after the expiration of the 2244(d) limitations period, this matter is clearly time barred and is precluded from consideration. Signed by Honorable Richard P. Conaboy on 5/22/13. (cc) Modified on 5/22/2013 (cc).
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 1.Petitioner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the sole purpose of the filing of this action.2. Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall file a response addressing the issues of whether his pending habeas corpus action is untimely and/or subject to dismissal on the basis of mootness as outlined herein.3. No further action shall be taken by this Court with respect to this matter pending resolution of the timeliness and mootness issues.4. Failure of Petitioner to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of his action.(cc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
