Hartpence v. Madison Township et al
||Building Inspection Underwriters of Pennsylvania, Inc., Philip Setzer, Madison Township Permit Officer, Howard Stevens, Madison Township Supervisors, Andy Nazarenko, Charles Frey, Madison Township and James Damski
||March 8, 2013
||Pennsylvania Middle District Court
||Malachy E Mannion
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Petition for Removal
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 24, 2014
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry) re 4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Madison Township Supervisors, Madison Township, Charles Frey, Philip Setzer, Andy Nazarenko, Howard Stevens, 2 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Building Inspection Underwriters of Pennsylvania, Inc., James Damski Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 2/24/14. (bs)
|February 24, 2014
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE. (1)the motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint filed on behalf of defendants James Damski and Building Underwriters of Pennsylvania, Inc., (Doc. No. 2), i s GRANTED;(2)the motion to dismiss the plaintiffs amended complaint filed on behalf of defendants Madison Township, Madison Township Supervisors, Andy Nazarenko, Charles Frey, Philip Setzer and Howard Stevens, (Doc. No. 4), is GRANTED;(3)the plaintiffs amended complaint, (Doc. No. 1), is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and(4)the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 2/24/14. (bs)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.