Reyes v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 22, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - Having found that Reyes has not shown grounds to reconsider our prior ruling, and having found: (1) that this limitations period prescribed by the Federal Tort ClaimsAct applies here, a nd bars this claim; and (2) further concluding that Reyes still has not presented legal or factual grounds justifying equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, this motion to reconsider will be denied and this action will remain dismissed as time-barred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on August 22, 2014. (kjn)
|May 20, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION (Order to follow as separate docket entry) - Finding that this limitations period prescribed by the Federal Tort Claims Act applies here, and bars this claim, and further concluding that Reyes has not presentedlegal or factual grounds justifying equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, this action will be dismissed as time-barred. Signed by Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson on May 20, 2014. (kjn)
|March 14, 2014
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:(1)The Report & Recommendation (Doc. 24) is ADOPTED.(2)Plaintiffs claim against the individual Defendant Erika Fenstermaker is DISMISSED with prejudice.(2)Plaintiffs claims proceed solely against the United States and solely under the Federal Tort Claims Act.(3)This matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Carlson.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 3/14/14. (jam)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?