Barbato v. Greystone Alliance, LLC
| Mary Barbato |
| Greystone Alliance, LLC |
| 3:2013cv02748 |
| November 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Wayne |
| William J. Nealon |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) Crown's motion to stay is GRANTED and this case is STAYED. The parties are directed to notify the court when the Supreme Court grants or denies the petition for a writ of certiorari.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 4/30/19. (bs)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)defendant Crowns motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), (Doc. 107), is DENIED;the plaintiffs motionS (Doc. 110)& (Doc. 116), are DENIED; Crowns request under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), (Doc. 114), is GRANTED;the courts directive that the parties file renewed summary judgment motions is held in abeyance until the Third Circuit decides whether Crown can be considered a debt collector under Henson;the court will STAY the plain tiffs Doc. 64 motion to certify class until it decides the renewed dispositive motions; and the courts instant Memorandum and Order are hereby CERTIFIED for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1292(b). (See order for full details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 11/16/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), defendant Crowns motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), (Doc. 107), is DENIED;the plaintiffs motionS (Doc. 110)& (Doc. 116), are DENIED; Crowns request under Fed.R.Civ. P. 12(f), (Doc. 114), is GRANTED;the courts directive that the parties file renewed summary judgment motions is held in abeyance until the Third Circuit decides whether Crown can be considered a debt collector under Henson;the court will STAY the pl aintiffs Doc. 64 motion to certify class until it decides the renewed dispositive motions; and the courts instant Memorandum and Order are hereby CERTIFIED for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1292(b). (See order for full details).Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 10/19/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 3/30/17. (ao)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable William J. Nealon on 1/15/14. (lh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Barbato v. Greystone Alliance, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Barbato | |
| Represented By: | Brett M. Freeman |
| Represented By: | Carlo Sabatini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greystone Alliance, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael J Palumbo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
