Gibson v. Thomas
Petitioner: Bernard Gibson, Sr.
Respondent: J.E. Thomas
Case Number: 3:2014cv00820
Filed: April 29, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Union
Presiding Judge: PT
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER denying 15 Motion for Reconsideration.Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/21/17 (jam)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) DISMISSING CASE, DENYING 12 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Bernard Gibson, Sr. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 1/19/16. (jam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibson v. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bernard Gibson, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J.E. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?