Mitchell v. Sage et al
Joseph S Mitchell |
J Sage, Kevin Pigos, Brown, Andrew Edinger, S. Dees, Holzaple, J. E. Thomas, John Does 1-10, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States |
3:2014cv00905 |
May 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Scranton Office |
Union |
Thomas M. Blewitt |
James M. Munley |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry),DENYING 46 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction/ Temporary Restraining Order Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 06/17/15. (sm) |
Filing 41 MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry).Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 5/20/15. (ms) |
Filing 26 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) ADOPTING in PART 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Blewitt; Pltf is provided 21 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint consistent with the rulin gs of this order; Failure to timely file will result in the dismissal of the remaning claims /dfts with prejudice. Clerk of Court is directed to REMAND case Magistrate Judge Blewitt for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 10/30/14. (sm) |
Filing 22 ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), DENYING 18 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 10/9/14. (sm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.