Francis v. Fuller et al
| Freddie Francis, Jr. |
| B. Fuller, M. Kubicki, E. Hayden, D. Ebbert, R. Caley, E. Dimmico, J. Potope, B. Buschman, C. Heigel, E. Santos, Walman, S. Should, K. Dewald and R. Parkin |
| 3:2014cv01248 |
| June 30, 2014 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Wayne |
| EC |
| James M. Munley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), GRANTING pltf motion to exclude evidence of prior convictions 96 ; GRANTING 104 MOTION to withdrwa motion re prison misconduct [97; and GRANTING dfts' motion re evidence of "traumatic Brain Insjury", though pltf may describe the injury suffered. Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 5/21/18. (sm)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry) GRANTING in part/DENYING in part 17 MOTION to Dismiss/ Summary Judgment- Official Capacity claims dismissed; Dft Ebbert termed as a defendant; Sum Jgm claims re dfts Carey, DeMicco, Potope,Buschman, Heigel, Santos, Waldman, Sholder, Dewald, and Parkyn; Denied re Qualified Immunity/8th Amd re dfts Fuller, Kubicki and Hayden, and will proceed to trial; Enclosing Consent Form to be filed w/i 15 days.Signed by Honorable James M. Munley on 8/8/17. (sm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
