Williamson v. Garman et al
Plaintiff: Sharif Williamson
Defendant: B. F. Garman, Haldeman, Lehmen, John Doe, Rackovan, Hoover and Tice
Case Number: 3:2015cv01797
Filed: September 15, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Centre
Presiding Judge: CA
Presiding Judge: Robert D. Mariani
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/22/17 (ep)
January 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER - 1. The motion (Doc. 29) to dismiss is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 28) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Plaintiff is granted 28 days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint. Failure to timely file a Second Amended Complaint may result in the dismissal of Plaintiffs action. 4. The Second Amended Complaint must specifically allege the following: a. Any claims of personal involvement by Defendant Lehman showing his personal direction or actual kno wledge and acquiescence in the strip search. b. Any allegations that the strip search was unnecessary and was conducted in an unconstitutional and illegal manner. c. Any actions the officers took that show the use of unnecessary force. Plaintiff must state specifically which officers placed their weight on him, and the manner in which they applied their weight. d. Any actions or statements made by the officers that reveal the officers derived sexual pleasure from the strip search. Plaintiff must state specifically which officers touched him, what body part was touched, and the manner in which the officers tOlJched him.5. Should Defendants file aMotion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must file a brief in opposition to such motion within 14 days after service of Defendants' brief. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 1/9/17. (jfg)
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER 1. The motions (Docs. 15, 24) to dismiss are GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. Plaintiff is granted 28 days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint. Failure to timely file an Ame nded Complaint may result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's action. 4. Should Defendants file a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must file a brief in opposition to such motion within 14 days after service of Defendants' brief.Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 6/29/16. (jfg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williamson v. Garman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharif Williamson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. F. Garman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haldeman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lehmen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rackovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?