Cope v. Reedy P. et al
| Robert Cope |
| Reedy P., Geisinger, Kosikoski, Ciocca, Tulipa, Winterstein and Martin |
| 3:2015cv01876 |
| September 29, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| CA |
| Robert D. Mariani |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 77 Motion to Dismiss due to Failure to Prosecute. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Trial set for 10/9/18 is CANCELLED. Clerk of Court to CLOSE the action. Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff's address set forth on the docket sheet. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 9/11/18 (jam)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:1.The R&R (Doc. 68) is ADOPTED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART.2.For the reasons set forth in the R&R, Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as legally frivolous and for failure to state a cl aim upon which relief can be granted. 3.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 52) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:a.For the reasons set forth in the R&R, Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Plain tiffs state law negligence claim. b.For the reasons set forth in the R&R, Defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED as to Defendants Wetzel, Delbalso, Reedy, and Geisinger.c.For the reasons s et forth in the Courts accompanying memorandum opinion, Defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim is GRANTED as to Defendants Wintersteen, Martin, Ciocca, and Toluba. d.For the reasons set forth in the R &R and this Courts accompanying memorandum opinion, Defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim is DENIED as to Defendant Kosakowski.4.Judgment is hereby entered IN FAVOR OF Defendants Wetzel, Delbalso, Re edy, Geisinger, Wintersteen, Martin, Ciocca, and Toluba and AGAINST Plaintiff Cope on all counts.5. Judgment is hereby entered IN FAVOR OF Defendant Kosakowski and AGAINST Plaintiff Cope on Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment and state law negligence claims.6.The case is REMANDED to Magistrate Judge Saporito for purposes of determining whether the parties will consent to his jurisdiction to conduct the trial in this matter. Signed by Honorable Robert D. Mariani on 10/18/17 (jam)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), construing Doc. 32 motion for reconsideration as a renewed motion to appoint counsel, denying the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 5/19/16. (ms)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry)denying Doc. 16 motion for appointment of counsel. Warden of SCI-Retreat shall provide plaintiff with reasonable library privileges in order to prosecute this case. Clerk of Court directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Warden, SCI-Retreat. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr on 11/30/15. (ms)(Copy of Order to Warden, SCI Retreat, from Chambers)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
