Robinson v. Warden
Petitioner: Clarence J. Robinson
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 3:2016cv00349
Filed: February 24, 2016
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
Office: Scranton Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: PT
Presiding Judge: A. Richard Caputo
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. Petitioner's motion for a preliminary injunction 8 is DISMISSED. Petitioner's motion for extension of time to file a reply is granted. Traverse will be accepted as timely filed 13 . 17 Motion for Permanent Injunction DISMISSED. Clerk of Court directed to close case. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 8/10/17 (dw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clarence J. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?