Miller v. Holt et al
| B. Miller |
| S. L. Holt, Lulushask and Sharon Lugis |
| 3:2016cv00605 |
| April 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Scranton Office |
| Luzerne |
| LQ |
| Edwin M. Kosik |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER (memorandum filed previously as separate docket entry), ORDER DISMISSING CASE1.Defendant Holts motion to dismiss and for summary judgment (Doc. 26) is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant Holt, and against the Plaintiff.2.Defendants, R.E. Lynn, S.P. Allen, and S.M. Holezman, will be dismissed pursuant to of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 3.The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 7/31/17. (bs)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 35 Motion for Permanent Injunction, directing Clerk to provide 25 Amended Complaint to USM for service on those defendants that did not waive service and to mark striked and return 41 document entitled Amended Complaint; SEE ORDER FOR ALL INFO; Signed by Honorable Malachy E Mannion on 3/24/17 (ep)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry)Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 10/28/16. (ep)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM (Order to follow as separate docket entry). Signed by Honorable Edwin M. Kosik on 9/16/2016. (emksec, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
